Car insurance

Tuesday June 21st, 2011 16:05 Movie Review: ‘Green Lantern’ (2011)

Director: Martin Campbell
Writer(s):
Greg Berlanti
Michael Green
Marc Guggenheim
Michael Goldenberg
Greg Berlanti
Michael Green
Marc Guggenheim

Cast:
Ryan Reynolds – Hal Jordan
Blake Lively – Carol Ferris
Peter Sarsgaard – Dr. Hector Hammond
Mark Strong – Thaal Sinestro
Angela Bassett – Dr. Amanda Waller

Preamble: One of DC’s more interesting characters, a superhero who can manifest his will as real world objects using a special ring, comes to the big screen with Ryan Reynolds starring.

Plot: an alien high council learns to harness willpower, the greatest power in the universe, and uses it to build not only a home planet (Oa) but a guild of intergalactic policemen. But one of the council’s own is driven mad by his attempt to harness the power of fear, and banished to a lost planet. When he escapes the prison the others have built to contain him there, he begins tearing a path through the galaxy. Eventually this path leads him to Earth, where a newly anointed Green Lantern (Hal Jordan) must quickly learn the ropes if he hopes to save his planet.

greenlantern

The Meat: This sounds like a pretty good setup for a cosmic superhero story, allowing for big action and alien interaction as Green Lantern learns about the other members of The Corps. Somewhere amidst the six screenwriters, and who knows how many rewrites, the screenplay loses all emotional impact. And the blame can’t solely be placed on the CG, which is good but overbearing in many places.

Ryan Reynolds is competent but forgettable as Hal Jordan, a hero who supposedly is given this honor because of his fearlessness, but who turns out to be a whiny sissy for much of the movie. Whereas ‘Iron Man’ embraced Tony Stark’s arrogance and showed his weaknesses without apologizing for who he was, apparently Warner Brothers thought it would be a good idea to turn ‘Green Lantern’ into a Lifetime movie for men – complete with under-cooked daddy issues. To top it off, any momentum in the action is routinely broken up by a serene romance between Reynolds and Blake Lively’s Carol Ferris that feels more like a brother/sister bond than anything remotely sexual. That lack of sexual tension is a perfect example of what’s wrong with the movie – nothing goes very far in either direction, and what we end up with is a middling snoozefest.

Take the secondary villain, Peter Sarsgaard’s Dr. Hank Hammond, who is powered by a small infection from Parallax’s power of fear. He becomes telepathic and telekinetic(and insane). But everything he does is confined to small gatherings on Earth (a dinner party, a laboratory). Remember the scale of the story’s setup, and the potential for a cosmic police chase? Completely ruined now. Instead of epic outer-space battles, we’re left with a movie focusing on Hammond’s problems with his father and Hal’s self-doubts and budding romance with Ferris. Meanwhile Parallax barrels through the galaxy murdering millions of alien life-forms offscreen. We only see Parallax truly in action when he rips the souls out of a few individuals, and by then it always feels like an afterthought.

No matter how much happens at once on screen, the amazing thing is that Green Lantern is never entertaining. Not once did the large group of people involved in its making decide what this movie was going to be about. Character arcs are meaningless, the alien designs don’t work, the humor is saccharine, and the threat never feels real or, more importantly, epic. There also is almost no time spent with Hal learning to use his powers, so the idea that he’s ready to confront Parallax is ludicrous. There’s nothing engaging here. If they do make a sequel, let’s hope there are more set pieces and the filmmakers have the self-restraint to use makeup for some of the aliens. That way maybe it won’t feel like a series of nicely rendered video game cut scenes. On the good side, the CG is well done in many places, and the movie does end in less than two hours which was a huge relief.

The Movie: 4/10

, , , In: Comic Books, Entertainment, Movie Reviews, Movies(4) Comments

Saturday March 5th, 2011 23:41 Comics stuff – Google wishes Will Eisner a happy birthday

Will Eisner’s birthday (94th) is being marked by google, which has put his Spirit character into their homepage logo. Eisner is a huge influence on me, not only for his great compositions within borders but for his frequently imaginative breaking of those borders to create unique layouts. As a result of the google plug, he’s also trending on twitter, making this one of the greatest exposures I’ve seen recently for a comic legend. If any of you happen to be looking for a great book of art there are several Eisner books to look at, I would like to recommend starting with THIS BOOK, ‘Will Eisner’s New York: Life in the Big City’. Having grown up as the son of Jewish immigrants in New York, Eisner gives the city itself a level of characterization that can only come from having lived there. It’s actually a collection of four books, including City People Notebook which was my first purchased Eisner work. Well worth the 20 bucks you can get it for on amazon to see one of the genuises of the medium at work.

Will Eisner google

In other comics news a bunch of indie comic creators are using twitter and their websites (mine included – look at the banner to the left) to help promote one another’s work. It’s a great example of using social media to try to provide support to colleagues, and it’s called the Indie Comics Alliance. Search for the #NDCA hashtag on twitter and check out what we’re working on. To see our stuff, remember to click on the fiction area and read the first issues of ‘Future Kings’ and ‘The Waiting Room’ for free.

pg04-noletters

, , , , , In: Coal Minds Fiction, Comic Books, Entertainment, Movies, Site NewsNo Comments

Saturday March 6th, 2010 02:42 Movie Review: ‘Alice in Wonderland’ (2010)

Director: Tim Burton
Writer(s): Linda Woolverton

Cast:
Mia Wasikowska – Alice
Johnny Depp – Mad Hatter
Helena Bonham Carter – Red Queen
Anne Hathaway – White Queen
Crispin Glover – Stayne/Knave of Hearts
Matt Lucas – Tweedledee/dum
Stephen Fry – Cheshire Cat

Preamble:
A big failure – not nearly as bold as it should have been in that failure. Who is this shackled Tim Burton imposter?

Plot Points:
13 years after Alice’s last adventure, her father is dead, her imagination is wildly inappropriate for the stuffy world she lives in, and she’s just been proposed to by someone who repulses her. Running away, she stumbles into a post-apocalyptic Wonderland. The folks of “Underland” question whether she’s the chosen one they’ve been waiting for. “Chosen one” in this case being a champion ‘Alice’ due to use a famous sword to defeat the Red Queen’s vicious monster, Jabberwocky.

The Meat:
That’s right, Tim Burton has found the two things missing from Alice in Wonderland: bloated CG and the kind of god-awful, Hollywood, forced feminism found in such re-imaginings as ‘King Arthur’ and ‘300’. If you want an Alice that questions stuffy convention with trite exposition, uses a suit of armor, and rides a huge mythical beast, this is your movie. Completing the emo-cycle, Johnny Depp steps in as a very sensitive Mad Hatter, complete with tragic back story. As the feminine one in their relationship, he’s waited patiently for her return, and sacrifices himself repeatedly so that she may fulfill her destiny. Not to mention, he’s a genius with his needle and thread!

Is there a point down there?

Is there a point down there?

Performances are hit or miss – one imagines Burton being too distracted with some of the technology involved to pay attention. Glover is good as the Knave of Hearts. Depp’s performance and accent are all over the place, and at turns echo Capt. Jack Sparrow and Willie Wonka. Anne Hathaway has moments as the White Queen, but is mostly forgettable and seemed to be a mockery of the character more than not. Mia Wasikowska does her best, but this simply isn’t an interesting antagonist. Isn’t it a bit much, to ask those familiar with the original stories to get excited over a 19 year old Alice fighting a dragon? Huge miscalculation. The one decision working out very well, though, was casting Helena Bonham Carter as the Red Queen. Her appearance does more to cause excitement than anything else in the movie, including Alice’s entrance to, and exit from, Wonderland. Most of the film’s funniest moments involve her, and the best visuals may be the severed heads that float along her castle’s moat.

It’s not clear what exactly Burton thought he was adding to Lewis Carroll’s mythos here. If he was so bothered by Alice’s origins, why not make a new fairy tale without the name branding? It would have lifted whatever restrictions prevented him from making real advancement of the story (adding slogans from the Spice Girls albums doesn’t count), and might have opened his famous imagination up to some new ideas. This also brings up the superiority of actual animation to so many of these live action/animation hybrid. The movements of the Knave of Hearts and a few other characters are distractingly stylized (although the Red Queen is perfect), and the quality of the backgrounds and costume designs can’t make up for it. I’d love to say that somewhere in here is a good movie, but the reality is that somewhere in here is a good story we’ve already seen told correctly.

Movie – 3/10

, , In: Entertainment, Movie Reviews, MoviesNo Comments